Lately I've been spending a lot of time on projects related to migrating traditional MPLS (based on LDP) to a new solution based on MPLS Segment Routing. Migrations can be challenging and very interesting, so I’ll try to illustrate, using the example of several clients – of course, the data will be anonymized – what the migration process looks like and what its main advantages are. I'm returning to running this blog because it gives me the motivation for further activities and learning. I hope there will be readers for what I share here and that it will be useful to someone.
Usefull links
Categories
Blog Archive
Reflecting on the value of CCIE and how it opened opportunities
Just wanted to come back to write this blog. I have been a CCIE for a few years now and wanted to share with you how many doors and opportunities it has opened for me. I am currently trying to motivate myself to study for the CCDE and focus on the world of AI, which is increasingly fascinating to me.
First, I asked AI for its current opinion on CCIE and CCDE. It seems that it's still worth going on this journey and focusing on learning.
That's why I will be posting various summaries from the world of Networking and AI here.
The CCIE (Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert) and CCDE (Cisco Certified Design Expert) certifications are among the most prestigious credentials in the IT industry, offering a wide range of technical and career opportunities. Here’s a deeper look at what they bring to the table:
CCIE (Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert):
Advanced Technical Expertise:
The CCIE certification validates your ability to design, implement, and troubleshoot complex network infrastructures.
It covers advanced topics such as routing and switching (CCIE Enterprise), data center technologies, security, service provider, and wireless networks.
You’ll gain hands-on experience with cutting-edge Cisco technologies, including SD-WAN, automation, and network programmability.
Career Growth:
Opens doors to high-level roles such as Senior Network Engineer, Network Architect, or Technical Consultant.
Employers value CCIE-certified professionals for their ability to solve complex network challenges and optimize performance.
Global Recognition:
CCIE is globally recognized as a gold standard in networking expertise, giving you credibility and respect in the industry.
Salary Potential:
CCIE-certified professionals often command higher salaries due to their specialized skills and ability to handle mission-critical networks.
Personal Satisfaction:
Achieving CCIE is a challenging but rewarding journey that brings a deep sense of accomplishment and confidence in your technical abilities.
CCDE (Cisco Certified Design Expert):
Network Design Mastery:
The CCDE certification focuses on advanced network design principles, enabling you to create scalable, secure, and efficient network architectures.
It emphasizes strategic thinking, including business requirements, technical constraints, and risk management.
You’ll learn to design solutions for large-scale networks, integrating technologies like MPLS, QoS, and cloud connectivity.
Strategic Roles:
Prepares you for roles such as Network Design Architect, Solutions Architect, or Technical Lead.
You’ll be responsible for designing networks that align with business goals and future-proof organizations.
Global Impact:
CCDE is recognized worldwide as a mark of excellence in network design, making you a sought-after expert for global projects.
Salary Potential:
CCDE-certified professionals often earn top-tier salaries due to their ability to design innovative and cost-effective solutions.
Personal Satisfaction:
Earning the CCDE certification is a testament to your ability to think strategically and solve complex design challenges, bringing immense professional pride.
Why Pursue CCIE or CCDE?
Technical Mastery: Both certifications push you to the forefront of networking technology, giving you the skills to work with the latest tools and methodologies.
Career Advancement: They open doors to leadership roles, consulting opportunities, and high-impact projects.
Global Opportunities: With these certifications, you can work anywhere in the world, as they are recognized and respected across industries.
Personal Growth: The rigorous preparation process is intellectually stimulating and builds resilience, problem-solving skills, and confidence.
Community and Recognition: Joining the elite group of CCIE and CCDE holders connects you with a global network of experts and thought leaders.
Conclusion:
Pursuing CCIE or CCDE is not just about earning a certification—it’s about transforming your career and becoming a leader in the networking field. The journey is demanding, but the rewards are immense: technical mastery, career growth, global recognition, and personal satisfaction. If you’re passionate about networking and ready to take your skills to the next level, CCIE and CCDE are the ultimate goals to strive for. They don’t just validate your expertise—they redefine what you’re capable of achieving.
2/03/2025 | Filed Under AI, CCDE, CCIE | 0 Comments
Why Migrate from MPLS to Segment Routing?
Why Migrate from MPLS to Segment Routing? A Comprehensive Guide
In today’s rapidly evolving networking landscape, enterprises face the constant challenge of optimizing their network infrastructure to meet growing demands for performance, scalability, and flexibility. One of the key trends in recent years is the migration from traditional MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching) to modern technologies like Segment Routing (SR). In this article, we will explore why migrating from MPLS to Segment Routing is a strategic move, the benefits it offers, and a detailed overview of the migration process from LDP (Label Distribution Protocol) to SR.
Why Migrate from MPLS to Segment Routing?
1. Simplified Network Architecture
MPLS, while effective, requires complex configuration and management, especially in large-scale networks. Segment Routing simplifies network architecture by eliminating the need for additional protocols like LDP or RSVP-TE (Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering). In SR, path information is encoded directly in packet headers, reducing the number of protocols and management mechanisms.
2. Improved Scalability
Segment Routing offers better scalability compared to MPLS. In traditional MPLS networks, each router must maintain the state of every label for every path, which can lead to significant memory and CPU overhead in large networks. SR stores path information more efficiently, enabling easier network scaling without requiring additional hardware resources.
3. Enhanced Traffic Control and Flexibility
SR provides greater flexibility in traffic engineering. By allowing administrators to define application-specific paths (segments), SR enables precise control over how traffic flows through the network. This is particularly useful for applications requiring high availability, such as cloud services or business-critical applications.
4. Seamless Integration with SDN (Software-Defined Networking)
Segment Routing is inherently compatible with SDN architectures, enabling greater automation and optimization. By integrating with SDN controllers, SR allows for dynamic traffic management, automatic fault detection, and fast rerouting, resulting in higher network availability and reliability.
5. Cost Reduction
Migrating to Segment Routing can lead to significant cost savings. The simplified architecture and reduced management requirements mean IT teams can operate more efficiently, and the costs associated with network maintenance can be significantly reduced. Additionally, SR can operate on existing MPLS infrastructure, allowing for a gradual migration without the need for immediate hardware upgrades.
6. Support for Modern Applications
In the era of digital transformation, enterprises are increasingly deploying modern applications such as IoT (Internet of Things), AI (Artificial Intelligence), and cloud-based services. Segment Routing is better suited to meet the demands of these applications, offering lower latency, higher throughput, and improved traffic control.
7. Easier Inter-Domain Traffic Management
For wide-area networks (WANs) or service provider networks, SR simplifies inter-domain traffic management. By enabling end-to-end path definition, SR allows for more efficient traffic management across different network domains, which is particularly important for large enterprises and telecom operators.
8. Future-Proofing with IPv6 Support
Segment Routing is designed with the future in mind, including full support for IPv6. As more organizations transition to IPv6, SR ensures a smooth migration and integration with new networking standards.
The Migration Process: From LDP to Segment Routing
Migrating from LDP-based MPLS to Segment Routing requires careful planning and execution. Below is a step-by-step guide to ensure a smooth transition:
1. Assess Your Current Network
Inventory Your Network: Document all devices, links, and configurations in your MPLS network.
Identify Dependencies: Determine which applications and services rely on LDP and MPLS.
Evaluate Hardware and Software Compatibility: Ensure your network devices support Segment Routing. Most modern routers and switches support SR, but older hardware may require upgrades.
2. Design the Segment Routing Architecture
Define Segment Routing Domains: Decide where SR will be implemented (e.g., core, edge, or entire network).
Plan Segment Identifiers (SIDs): Allocate Node SIDs, Adjacency SIDs, and any other required SIDs.
Design Traffic Engineering Policies: Define how traffic will be steered using SR policies, especially for critical applications.
3. Configure Segment Routing
Enable SR on Devices: Configure SR on routers and switches, ensuring compatibility with existing MPLS infrastructure.
Configure IGP (Interior Gateway Protocol): Use protocols like OSPF or IS-IS to distribute SIDs and SR information.
Implement SR Policies: Define and deploy SR policies for traffic engineering and path optimization.
4. Test the SR Configuration
Conduct Lab Testing: Test the SR configuration in a lab environment to validate functionality and performance.
Simulate Failures: Test fault tolerance and rerouting capabilities to ensure network resilience.
Verify Interoperability: Ensure SR works seamlessly with existing MPLS and LDP configurations.
5. Gradually Migrate Traffic
Start with Non-Critical Traffic: Begin by migrating less critical traffic to SR to minimize risk.
Monitor Performance: Use network monitoring tools to track performance and identify any issues.
Migrate Critical Traffic: Once the SR network is stable, migrate critical applications and services.
6. Decommission LDP
Disable LDP on Devices: Once all traffic has been migrated to SR, disable LDP on routers and switches.
Remove LDP Configurations: Clean up any remaining LDP configurations to simplify the network.
7. Optimize and Maintain
Fine-Tune SR Policies: Continuously optimize SR policies based on network performance and traffic patterns.
Monitor and Troubleshoot: Use monitoring tools to proactively identify and resolve issues.
Train Your Team: Ensure your network team is trained on Segment Routing concepts and management.
Key Considerations During Migration
Phased Approach: A gradual migration reduces risk and allows for thorough testing at each stage.
Backup and Rollback Plans: Always have a rollback plan in case of unexpected issues during migration.
Vendor Support: Work closely with your hardware and software vendors to ensure compatibility and resolve any issues.
Documentation: Keep detailed documentation of the migration process, configurations, and changes for future reference.
Conclusion
Migrating from MPLS to Segment Routing is a strategic decision that can bring significant benefits to your organization, including simplified architecture, improved scalability, enhanced traffic control, and cost savings. The migration process, particularly from LDP to SR, requires careful planning, testing, and execution, but the long-term advantages far outweigh the initial effort.
By adopting Segment Routing, your organization can build a more efficient, flexible, and future-proof network capable of meeting the demands of modern applications and digital transformation. If you’re considering this migration, consult with networking experts to develop a tailored strategy that ensures a smooth and successful transition.
1/08/2025 | Filed Under MPLS, SR | 0 Comments
Segment Routing vs. Traditional MPLS: A Modern Approach to Traffic Engineering
1. Introduction
Modern networks strive for greater efficiency, simpler management, and enhanced flexibility. Segment Routing (SR) has emerged as a powerful alternative to traditional MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching), eliminating many of its limitations, such as reliance on Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) and RSVP-TE for signaling. This article compares SR-MPLS with classical MPLS and explores its key advantages, including a step-by-step migration process illustrated with network diagrams.
2. Traditional MPLS and Its Limitations
MPLS uses labels for efficient packet forwarding, relying on LDP for label distribution or RSVP-TE for traffic engineering. While MPLS has served networks well, it faces challenges in scalability and complexity.
Limitations of MPLS:
LDP dependency: A separate protocol for label distribution, increasing overhead.
No native ECMP support: RSVP-TE lacks equal-cost multipath (ECMP) forwarding.
Complex control plane: Each router must maintain LDP sessions, increasing memory and processing requirements.
Traffic engineering challenges: Requires additional mechanisms such as RSVP-TE or centralized SDN controllers.
3. Segment Routing: A Modern Alternative
Segment Routing (SR-MPLS) simplifies network design by encoding the forwarding path within the packet itself using Segment Identifiers (SIDs). Instead of relying on LDP, SR uses existing IGP (OSPF/IS-IS) extensions to distribute labels.
Advantages of SR:
No need for LDP: Simplifies the control plane.
Uses IGP for label distribution: Eliminates additional protocols.
Stateless core: Reduces memory and processing overhead on routers.
Better traffic engineering: Native support for SR-TE (Segment Routing Traffic Engineering).
Built-in ECMP: Efficient utilization of available paths.
4. Migration from MPLS-LDP to Segment Routing
Migration to SR is typically done in phases to minimize service disruption. The following sections illustrate this transition with network diagrams.
4.1 Initial State: MPLS Network with LDP
In this stage, the network is fully MPLS-based, with LDP used for label distribution.
(Image: Traditional MPLS Network with LDP)
4.2 Hybrid State: Coexistence of LDP and SR
During migration, both LDP and SR run in parallel, allowing gradual migration of routers to SR.
(Image: Hybrid Network with MPLS-LDP and Segment Routing)
4.3 Fully Migrated State: Pure SR-MPLS Network
Once all routers support SR, LDP is removed, simplifying the network architecture.
(Image: Fully Migrated Segment Routing Network)
5. Configuration Examples
5.1 MPLS-LDP Configuration (Traditional Approach)
router isis 1
net 49.0001.0000.0000.0001.00
is-type level-2
metric-style wide
mpls ip
mpls label protocol ldp
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
mpls ip
mpls ldp
router ldp
mpls ldp router-id Loopback0 force
5.2 Segment Routing Configuration
router isis 1
net 49.0001.0000.0000.0001.00
is-type level-2
metric-style wide
segment-routing mpls
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
ip router isis 1
segment-routing
mpls
set srgb 16000 23999
node-sid 16001
6. Conclusion
Segment Routing provides a more scalable, flexible, and efficient alternative to traditional MPLS-LDP. By eliminating LDP and RSVP-TE, SR-MPLS simplifies operations, reduces control plane overhead, and enables advanced traffic engineering. Migrating to SR can be done in phases to ensure smooth adoption without disrupting services.
10/17/2024 | Filed Under MPLS, SR | 0 Comments
Data Center Notes
http://dustydev.blogspot.com/2013/03/data-center-design-constraints.html
http://dustydev.blogspot.fr/2013/08/cisco-nexus-7000-proxy-routing.html
6/29/2017 | Filed Under DC Notes | 0 Comments
DHCP Options
Source info => IANA
DHCP OPTION FIELD :
Tag | Name | Desription | RFC |
0 | Pad | None | [RFC2132] |
1 | Subnet Mask | Subnet Mask Value | [RFC2132] |
2 | Time Offset | Time Offset in Seconds from UTC (note: deprecated by 100 and 101) | [RFC2132] |
3 | Router | N/4 Router addresses | [RFC2132] |
4 | Time Server | N/4 Timeserver addresses | [RFC2132] |
5 | Name Server | N/4 IEN-116 Server addresses | [RFC2132] |
6 | Domain Server | N/4 DNS Server addresses | [RFC2132] |
7 | Log Server | N/4 Logging Server addresses | [RFC2132] |
8 | Quotes Server | N/4 Quotes Server addresses | [RFC2132] |
9 | LPR Server | N/4 Printer Server addresses | [RFC2132] |
10 | Impress Server | N/4 Impress Server addresses | [RFC2132] |
11 | RLP Server | N/4 RLP Server addresses | [RFC2132] |
12 | Hostname | Hostname string | [RFC2132] |
13 | Boot File Size | Size of boot file in 512 byte chunks | [RFC2132] |
14 | Merit Dump File | Client to dump and name the file to dump it to | [RFC2132] |
15 | Domain Name | The DNS domain name of the client | [RFC2132] |
16 | Swap Server | Swap Server address | [RFC2132] |
17 | Root Path | Path name for root disk | [RFC2132] |
18 | Extension File | Path name for more BOOTP info | [RFC2132] |
19 | Forward On/Off | Enable/Disable IP Forwarding | [RFC2132] |
20 | SrcRte On/Off | Enable/Disable Source Routing | [RFC2132] |
21 | Policy Filter | Routing Policy Filters | [RFC2132] |
22 | Max DG Assembly | Max Datagram Reassembly Size | [RFC2132] |
23 | Default IP TTL | Default IP Time to Live | [RFC2132] |
24 | MTU Timeout | Path MTU Aging Timeout | [RFC2132] |
25 | MTU Plateau | Path MTU Plateau Table | [RFC2132] |
26 | MTU Interface | Interface MTU Size | [RFC2132] |
27 | MTU Subnet | All Subnets are Local | [RFC2132] |
28 | Broadcast Address | Broadcast Address | [RFC2132] |
29 | Mask Discovery | Perform Mask Discovery | [RFC2132] |
30 | Mask Supplier | Provide Mask to Others | [RFC2132] |
31 | Router Discovery | Perform Router Discovery | [RFC2132] |
32 | Router Request | Router Solicitation Address | [RFC2132] |
33 | Static Route | Static Routing Table | [RFC2132] |
34 | Trailers | Trailer Encapsulation | [RFC2132] |
35 | ARP Timeout | ARP Cache Timeout | [RFC2132] |
36 | Ethernet | Ethernet Encapsulation | [RFC2132] |
37 | Default TCP TTL | Default TCP Time to Live | [RFC2132] |
38 | Keepalive Time | TCP Keepalive Interval | [RFC2132] |
39 | Keepalive Data | TCP Keepalive Garbage | [RFC2132] |
40 | NIS Domain | NIS Domain Name | [RFC2132] |
41 | NIS Servers | NIS Server Addresses | [RFC2132] |
42 | NTP Servers | NTP Server Addresses | [RFC2132] |
43 | Vendor Specific | Vendor Specific Information | [RFC2132] |
44 | NETBIOS Name Srv | NETBIOS Name Servers | [RFC2132] |
45 | NETBIOS Dist Srv | NETBIOS Datagram Distribution | [RFC2132] |
46 | NETBIOS Node Type | NETBIOS Node Type | [RFC2132] |
47 | NETBIOS Scope | NETBIOS Scope | [RFC2132] |
48 | X Window Font | X Window Font Server | [RFC2132] |
49 | X Window Manager | X Window Display Manager | [RFC2132] |
50 | Address Request | Requested IP Address | [RFC2132] |
51 | Address Time | IP Address Lease Time | [RFC2132] |
52 | Overload | Overload "sname" or "file" | [RFC2132] |
53 | DHCP Msg Type | DHCP Message Type | [RFC2132] |
54 | DHCP Server Id | DHCP Server Identification | [RFC2132] |
55 | Parameter List | Parameter Request List | [RFC2132] |
56 | DHCP Message | DHCP Error Message | [RFC2132] |
57 | DHCP Max Msg Size | DHCP Maximum Message Size | [RFC2132] |
58 | Renewal Time | DHCP Renewal (T1) Time | [RFC2132] |
59 | Rebinding Time | DHCP Rebinding (T2) Time | [RFC2132] |
60 | Class Id | Class Identifier | [RFC2132] |
61 | Client Id | Client Identifier | [RFC2132] |
62 | NetWare/IP Domain | NetWare/IP Domain Name | [RFC2242] |
63 | NetWare/IP Option | NetWare/IP sub Options | [RFC2242] |
64 | NIS-Domain-Name | NIS+ v3 Client Domain Name | [RFC2132] |
65 | NIS-Server-Addr | NIS+ v3 Server Addresses | [RFC2132] |
66 | Server-Name | TFTP Server Name | [RFC2132] |
67 | Bootfile-Name | Boot File Name | [RFC2132] |
68 | Home-Agent-Addrs | Home Agent Addresses | [RFC2132] |
69 | SMTP-Server | Simple Mail Server Addresses | [RFC2132] |
70 | POP3-Server | Post Office Server Addresses | [RFC2132] |
71 | NNTP-Server | Network News Server Addresses | [RFC2132] |
72 | WWW-Server | WWW Server Addresses | [RFC2132] |
73 | Finger-Server | Finger Server Addresses | [RFC2132] |
74 | IRC-Server | Chat Server Addresses | [RFC2132] |
75 | StreetTalk-Server | StreetTalk Server Addresses | [RFC2132] |
76 | STDA-Server | ST Directory Assist. Addresses | [RFC2132] |
77 | User-Class | User Class Information | [RFC3004] |
78 | Directory Agent | directory agent information | [RFC2610] |
79 | Service Scope | service location agent scope | [RFC2610] |
80 | Rapid Commit | Rapid Commit | [RFC4039] |
81 | Client FQDN | Fully Qualified Domain Name | [RFC4702] |
82 | Relay Agent Information | Relay Agent Information | [RFC3046] |
83 | iSNS | Internet Storage Name Service | [RFC4174] |
84 | REMOVED/Unassigned | [RFC3679] | |
85 | NDS Servers | Novell Directory Services | [RFC2241] |
86 | NDS Tree Name | Novell Directory Services | [RFC2241] |
87 | NDS Context | Novell Directory Services | [RFC2241] |
88 | BCMCS Controller Domain Name list | [RFC4280] | |
89 | BCMCS Controller IPv4 address option | [RFC4280] | |
90 | Authentication | Authentication | [RFC3118] |
91 | client-last-transaction-time option | [RFC4388] | |
92 | associated-ip option | [RFC4388] | |
93 | Client System | Client System Architecture | [RFC4578] |
94 | Client NDI | Client Network Device Interface | [RFC4578] |
95 | LDAP | Lightweight Directory Access Protocol | [RFC3679] |
96 | REMOVED/Unassigned | [RFC3679] | |
97 | UUID/GUID | UUID/GUID-based Client Identifier | [RFC4578] |
98 | User-Auth | Open Group's User Authentication | [RFC2485] |
99 | GEOCONF_CIVIC | [RFC4776] | |
100 | PCode | IEEE 1003.1 TZ String | [RFC4833] |
101 | TCode | Reference to the TZ Database | [RFC4833] |
102-107 | REMOVED/Unassigned | [RFC3679] | |
108 | REMOVED/Unassigned | [RFC3679] | |
109 | Unassigned | [RFC3679] | |
110 | REMOVED/Unassigned | [RFC3679] | |
111 | Unassigned | [RFC3679] | |
112 | Netinfo Address | NetInfo Parent Server Address | [RFC3679] |
113 | Netinfo Tag | NetInfo Parent Server Tag | [RFC3679] |
114 | URL | URL | [RFC3679] |
115 | REMOVED/Unassigned | [RFC3679] | |
116 | Auto-Config | DHCP Auto-Configuration | [RFC2563] |
117 | Name Service Search | Name Service Search | [RFC2937] |
118 | Subnet Selection Option | Subnet Selection Option | [RFC3011] |
119 | Domain Search | DNS domain search list | [RFC3397] |
120 | SIP Servers DHCP Option | SIP Servers DHCP Option | [RFC3361] |
121 | Classless Static Route Option | Classless Static Route Option | [RFC3442] |
122 | CCC | CableLabs Client Configuration | [RFC3495] |
123 | GeoConf Option | GeoConf Option | [RFC6225] |
124 | V-I Vendor Class | Vendor-Identifying Vendor Class | [RFC3925] |
125 | V-I Vendor-Specific Information | Vendor-Identifying Vendor-Specific Information | [RFC3925] |
126 | Removed/Unassigned | [RFC3679] | |
127 | Removed/Unassigned | [RFC3679] | |
128 | PXE - undefined (vendor specific) | [RFC4578] | |
128 | Etherboot signature. 6 bytes: E4:45:74:68:00:00 | ||
128 | DOCSIS "full security" server IP address | ||
128 | TFTP Server IP address (for IP Phone software load) | ||
129 | PXE - undefined (vendor specific) | [RFC4578] | |
129 | Kernel options. Variable length string | ||
129 | Call Server IP address | ||
130 | PXE - undefined (vendor specific) | [RFC4578] | |
130 | Ethernet interface. Variable length string. | ||
130 | Discrimination string (to identify vendor) | ||
131 | PXE - undefined (vendor specific) | [RFC4578] | |
131 | Remote statistics server IP address | ||
132 | PXE - undefined (vendor specific) | [RFC4578] | |
132 | IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID | ||
133 | PXE - undefined (vendor specific) | [RFC4578] | |
133 | IEEE 802.1D/p Layer 2 Priority | ||
134 | PXE - undefined (vendor specific) | [RFC4578] | |
134 | Diffserv Code Point (DSCP) for VoIP signalling and media streams | ||
135 | PXE - undefined (vendor specific) | [RFC4578] | |
135 | HTTP Proxy for phone-specific applications | ||
136 | OPTION_PANA_AGENT | [RFC5192] | |
137 | OPTION_V4_LOST | [RFC5223] | |
138 | OPTION_CAPWAP_AC_V4 | CAPWAP Access Controller addresses | [RFC5417] |
139 | OPTION-IPv4_Address-MoS | a series of suboptions | [RFC5678] |
140 | OPTION-IPv4_FQDN-MoS | a series of suboptions | [RFC5678] |
141 | SIP UA Configuration Service Domains | List of domain names to search for SIP User Agent Configuration | [RFC6011] |
142 | OPTION-IPv4_Address-ANDSF | ANDSF IPv4 Address Option for DHCPv4 | [RFC6153] |
143 | Unassigned | ||
144 | GeoLoc | Geospatial Location with Uncertainty | [RFC6225] |
145 | FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE | Forcerenew Nonce Capable | [RFC6704] |
146 | RDNSS Selection | Information for selecting RDNSS | [RFC6731] |
147-149 | Unassigned | [RFC3942] | |
150 | TFTP server address | [RFC5859] | |
150 | Etherboot | ||
150 | GRUB configuration path name | ||
151 | status-code | Status code and optional N byte text message describing status. | [RFC6926] |
152 | base-time | Absolute time (seconds since Jan 1, 1970) message was sent. | [RFC6926] |
153 | start-time-of-state | Number of seconds in the past when client entered current state. | [RFC6926] |
154 | query-start-time | Absolute time (seconds since Jan 1, 1970) for beginning of query. | [RFC6926] |
155 | query-end-time | Absolute time (seconds since Jan 1, 1970) for end of query. | [RFC6926] |
156 | dhcp-state | State of IP address. | [RFC6926] |
157 | data-source | Indicates information came from local or remote server. | [RFC6926] |
158 | OPTION_V4_PCP_SERVER | Includes one or multiple lists of PCP server IP addresses; each list is treated as a separate PCP server. | [RFC7291] |
159 | OPTION_V4_PORTPARAMS | This option is used to configure a set of ports bound to a shared IPv4 address. | [RFC7618] |
160 | DHCP Captive-Portal | DHCP Captive-Portal | [RFC7710] |
161-174 | Unassigned | [RFC3942] | |
175 | Etherboot (Tentatively Assigned - 2005-06-23) | ||
176 | IP Telephone (Tentatively Assigned - 2005-06-23) | ||
177 | Etherboot (Tentatively Assigned - 2005-06-23) | ||
177 | PacketCable and CableHome (replaced by 122) | ||
178-207 | Unassigned | [RFC3942] | |
208 | PXELINUX Magic | magic string = F1:00:74:7E | [RFC5071][Deprecated] |
209 | Configuration File | Configuration file | [RFC5071] |
210 | Path Prefix | Path Prefix Option | [RFC5071] |
211 | Reboot Time | Reboot Time | [RFC5071] |
212 | OPTION_6RD | OPTION_6RD with N/4 6rd BR addresses | [RFC5969] |
213 | OPTION_V4_ACCESS_DOMAIN | Access Network Domain Name | [RFC5986] |
214-219 | Unassigned | ||
220 | Subnet Allocation Option | Subnet Allocation Option | [RFC6656] |
221 | Virtual Subnet Selection (VSS) Option | [RFC6607] | |
222-223 | Unassigned | [RFC3942] | |
224-254 | Reserved (Private Use) | ||
255 | End | None | [RFC2132] |
11/01/2016 | Filed Under DHCP | 0 Comments
Popular Posts
-
BGP forms a unique, unicast-based connection to each of its BGP-speaking peers. BGP increased the reliability of the communication between ...
-
As I wrote before, when Router is in „Connect State” it’s waiting for a completed TCP connection. To do this task, the two neighbors must p...
-
Recently I've been gathering in my work all cisco equipment which I can use to lab. I have found few routers (2911, 1921, 1811), switche...
-
SPAN – Switched Port Analyzer it’s a great tool when you need to troubleshoot something in your network. It’s called port mirroring or port ...
-
JUNOS upgrade on MX960 platform. Recently I have been participating in project where we had to upgade few big boxes in the network. I ...